President Yoweri Museveni has responded to an argument by Andrew Mwenda criticizing the eviction of the Balaalo from northern Uganda.
Last month, Andrew Mwenda said he does “completely disagree with President Museveni’s decision to evict the Balaalo from the North,” warning that he believed Museveni was “treading on very dangerous political ground.”
“I urge you, the Baganda, to behave like politicians in Northern Uganda—demand that all of us be evicted from here. Why should Basamia, Acholi, Batoro, and others have the right to own property in Buganda, yet the Balaalo are denied that same right in Acholi?” submitted Andrew Mwenda.
“I find it outrageous that Ugandans who genuinely acquired land through willing buyer–willing seller agreements are now being evicted. This goes against the Ugandan Constitution, Pan-Africanism, and the very essence of being Ugandan.”
Now, Museveni has fired back at Mwenda reminding him that some ‘arrogant’ Balaalo had refused to follow local practices on resolving conflicts regarding cattle straying into gardens and plantations.
“However, apparently, these justice measures cannot be followed by some of the arrogant Balaalo who will come with their armed relatives from the Army and, therefore, these simple justice practices cannot apply to such powerful People. That is why they need the Executive Order of the President of Uganda,” Museveni responded.
“Therefore, Our great freedom fighter Andrew Mwenda, should not misdirect his efforts about my Executive Orders condoning tribal Chauvinism that frowns at Ugandans migrating legally to other areas. I know of a Munyoro woman, Adyeeri, who is a big farmer in Nwoya, growing fruits. She is very much loved from what I saw by the Locals. The resentment by the Locals and my Executive Orders are not about the legal and rational actors. They are both directed at the illegal and the irrational.”
Here is Museveni’s full response on the issue of eviction of Balaalo:
My social-media Manager, has drawn my attention to the lies and distortions on the social-media about the issue of the Balaalo in Northern, North Western and Eastern Uganda. The mistakes by the Balaalo in those areas are the following:
1. Okwonesa (cattle or other livestock, grazing on other People’s crops). Is that part of patriotism of a United Uganda? Is that part of the freedom of Movement of Ugandans within Uganda?
2. That kwonesa (livestock eating People’s crops), comes from introducing cattle in an area where there is no senge-nge (barbed wire)-good barbed wires or even chain links (obutiimba) to deal with the goats.
3. Even those who may have fenced, they may not have permanent water sources on the farm (bought or rented). Hence, in the dry season, they move out to look for water and, hence, kwonera People (livestock eating People’s crops).
4. Then, there is fencing carelessly by blocking People’s routes to the Nile River or other Public facilities.
5. The issue of non-Acholi’s or Northerners, legally owning land in the North comes in last. It is this one that should involve the lawyers. Which land did you, the Mulaalo, buy or rent? Was it Communal land fraudulently sold or rented by a few People or was it private land? The legality of the land ownership, however, is not the immediate irritant.
Whether you legally bought or rented the land, you have no right to kwoneseza People (your livestock grazing on People’s crops); nor do you have the right to block People’s access routes. Regarding the Kwonesa, that is why removing the Cattle and other livestock that come from outside that area from the area, is appropriate, so that the issue of legal ownership can be settled peacefully. The non-Acholi, non- Northerners who do crop agriculture in the area, do not generate the same outcry. Why? They do not Kwonesa. Crops do not Kwoona other crops.
6. These patriotic Balaalo that love Uganda so much that they move around in disorderly ways, have invaded Government ranches. This patriotic action stops the Goverment from doing its planned projects there, such as cattle breeding. It also instigates the locals to ask the question : “If the Government does not need the ranches, why do they not allow us to also settle in them?”
7. Did these Balaalo get legal Cattle Movement permits, in the first place? This is ebaruha y’okufuruka (Movement Permit). The givers of these permits should always ensure that there are no problems (diseases, ownership, etc.) where the Cattle are coming from and no problems where the Cattle are going (diseases, space, Kwonesa potential, etc). If the permits were legally given, why was the scarcity of water, the lack of fencing, the Kwonesa, etc not checked?
8. Did they get Cattle Movement permits into the Government ranches? Therefore, Our great freedom fighter Andrew Mwenda, should not misdirect his efforts about my Executive Orders condoning tribal Chauvinism that frowns at Ugandans migrating legally to other areas. I know of a Munyoro woman, Adyeeri, who is a big farmer in Nwoya, growing fruits. She is very much loved from what I saw by the Locals. The resentment by the Locals and my Executive Orders are not about the legal and rational actors. They are both directed at the illegal and the irrational.
9. Northerners, also kwoneseza one another (livestock eating crops). However, I hear, that for them, they have their local practices, which are also common in other areas, where you kutsibika (tying) the offending cow until the owner comes to redeem it and pays a fine. However, apparently, these justice measures cannot be followed by some of the arrogant Balaalo who will come with their armed relatives from the Army and, therefore, these simple justice practices cannot apply to such powerful People. That is why they need the Executive Order of the President of Uganda.
Andrew Mwenda was recently involved in a shouting match during which all hell broke loose on live TV as he was asked ‘who funds you?’ Prior to that he faced accusations of supporting M23 rebels. (See Details Here, and There).
