‘Only God Can Save Uganda – Especially after the Passing of New UPDF Law’

Uganda now needs the hand of God more than ever. The passing of the UPDF act has proved that Ugandans are destined for the worst.

Uganda stands at a critical juncture, with the recent passing of the UPDF amendment bill sparking widespread concern and resistance.

As the nation grapples with the implications of this development, many Ugandans are left wondering about the future of their country.

The fears are multifaceted.

Some worry about the Court Martial’s tendency to pass judgment without due process, while others recall the past persecution of opposition politicians on trumped-up charges.

The potential for abuse of power and suppression of dissent is palpable. In this context, the role of the legislature and the rule of law comes under scrutiny.

The passing of the bill has been seen as a move to consolidate power, leaving many to question the independence of Parliament and the extent to which it is driven by the ruling party’s interests rather than the will of the people.

As the country teeters on the brink, the importance of citizen participation in the electoral process cannot be overstated.

The disillusionment and apathy that have led some Ugandans to swear not to vote are understandable, but they also pose a significant threat to the prospects of meaningful change.

As an aspiring presidential candidate, the author of the original write-up offers a vision for a better Uganda, one that is grounded in the reinstatement of the rule of law and constitutional order.

This vision resonates with many who are eager for a departure from the current state of affairs. However, achieving this vision requires active participation in the electoral process.

It demands that Ugandans mobilize, sensitize one another, and exercise their right to vote.

The responsibility for effecting change lies not just with a few but with the collective citizenry.

In the face of uncertainty, the author turns to prayer, citing II Chronicles 7:14, which speaks to the power of humility, prayer, and repentance in healing a land.

This biblical reference underscores the belief that even in the darkest of times, there is hope for redemption and transformation.

As Uganda navigates these challenging times, it is clear that the path forward will require courage, resilience, and a commitment to democratic principles.

The question remains whether the current regime can evolve to meet the aspirations of its people or if change will come through the ballot box.

Ultimately, the future of Uganda rests in the hands of its citizens. By participating in the electoral process and demanding accountability, Ugandans can shape the course of their nation’s history.

The call to action is clear: to seek the mercy of God, to mobilize for change, and to vote for a better future.

Gerald Malinga is a 2026 presidential hopeful

You can read more about proposals in Malinga’s heath manifesto, including a TukTuk Ambulance for Every Parish, and a Midwife Per Village, a proposal for including all LC One chairpersons on the government payroll as well as  a proposal blocking MPs from getting free cars Here, There, and Over There. 

Civilians Can Officially be Tried in Military Courts as House passes Bill on military-related offences

Parliament has passed the Uganda Peoples’ Defence Forces (Amendment) Bill, 2025, that will see civilians tried in the courts martial.

The Bill introduces sweeping reforms to the military justice system, restructures health services for armed forces personnel, and streamlines veterans’ affairs. It establishes a Directorate of Military Prosecutions to professionalise the process.

It also protects against premature execution of a death sentence until it is confirmed by the Supreme Court.

Additionally, the Bill sets out clear apparent process for courts martial decisions; from Unit Court Martial to the Division Court Martial, from Division Court Martial to the General Court Martial, from General Court Martial to the Court of Appeal, and finally to the Supreme Court.

Presenting the motion on Tuesday, 20 May 2025, in a plenary session chaired by Speaker Anita Among, the Minister of Defence and Veteran Affairs, Hon. Jacob Oboth, said that the Bill is not about subjecting civilians to military courts arbitrarily, but targets those who engage in military-related offences.

“This law addresses civilians who acquire arms or equipment used for violence, those who masquerade as militants, and those who commit offences in collaboration with military personnel. I want to dispel fears that this law targets all Ugandans,” Oboth said.

Tabling the report of the joint committee, Hon. Wilson Kajwengye, Chairperson of the Committee on Defence and Internal Affairs, said: “The committee has examined this matter and concludes that the trial of civilians by military courts should occur only in exceptional circumstances, ensuring that a fair trial is guaranteed.”

The Bill responds to the Supreme Court’s decision in Attorney General vs. Hon. Michael A. Kabaziguruka, Constitutional Appeal No. 2 of 2021, which found that the trial of civilians in military courts under the current UPDF Act was unconstitutional.

Kajwengye noted that the proposed changes require the restructuring of military courts to ensure independence and transparency.

“This requires changes to the military structure to ensure that those presiding over trials are appointed through a transparent process and operate independently of superior influence,” he added.

The Bill introduces reforms relating to the structure, appointments, and jurisdiction of military courts.

However, the committee also raised several concerns.

“The roles and mandate of the Military Courts Department are vague, leaving gaps in oversight and accountability. This overlap of judicial and prosecutorial roles is a violation of natural justice,” Kajwengye said.

On judicial appointments, the committee recommended increased civilian oversight and the administration of judicial oaths, a proposal upheld by the House.

“The committee contends that military courts must be governed by the judicial oath and legal standards. Military court judges should be appointed by the Commander-in-Chief on the recommendation of the Judicial Service Commission from a list generated by the High Command.”

The committee further proposed that appeals from the General Court Martial should lie with the Court of Appeal.

Regarding military property, the committee recommended the regulation of military-style attire that lacks UPDF insignia, to distinguish it from civilian wear.

Despite a walk-out by several members of the Opposition led by Hon. Joel Ssenyonyi, their leader, the handful that remained in the Chamber put up a spirited fight.

A minority report authored by Hon. Moses Okot (FDC, Kioga County) criticised the Bill as unconstitutional and contrary to the Supreme Court’s judgment. — Report: Parliament of Uganda.

MORE ON THIS STORY

1. UPDF Amendment Bill 2025: Here are the Circumstances Under Which Civilians Will be Tried in Military Courts
2. BEWARE! That Kaunda Suit Might Land You in Trouble With Museveni Military Courts Under ‘New’ UPDF Law
3. ‘History Speaks With Thunder: UPDF Act Will One Day Be Used Against Muhoozi and His Father Museveni‘

Please Follow our Whatsapp Channel for More Stories Here